Media Exclusion Raises Transparency Concerns at Biden’s Trilateral Meeting


In a recent development that has sparked widespread concern among advocates for press freedom and transparency, journalists were notably barred from attending a significant trilateral meeting between President Joe Biden and the leaders of Japan and the Philippines. This incident, occurring on April 11, 2024, involved Prime Minister Kishida Fumio and President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., marking yet another instance where the press faced restrictions from covering Biden's engagements with international dignitaries.

The exclusion of the press from this high-profile meeting has raised eyebrows, especially considering the importance of media access to government affairs. Reporters who were poised to observe and report on the discussions were left waiting in a hallway, missing out on Biden's opening remarks due to what was described as a logistical snafu.

This move has been interpreted by some as part of a broader pattern of limited media access under the Biden administration, fueling debates over transparency and the public's right to be informed about diplomatic interactions.

Critics argue that such actions not only hinder the press's ability to perform its essential role in a democratic society but also raise questions about what the administration might be seeking to keep out of the public eye. The incident has been particularly troubling for those who view press freedom as a cornerstone of democracy, with concerns that denying access could set a concerning precedent for future interactions between the government and the media.

Amidst growing skepticism towards the reliability of mainstream media, alternative news outlets have claimed recognition for their efforts to provide accurate reporting. The Gateway Pundit, for instance, has positioned itself as a source of truthful information, contrasting its work with the perceived failures of other media entities. This stance underscores the ongoing debate over media trustworthiness and the challenges faced by journalists in an increasingly polarized information landscape.

The recent trilateral meeting serves as a stark reminder of the challenges that lie ahead in ensuring transparency and accountability in government affairs. As the Biden administration continues to navigate complex international relations, the role of the media in scrutinizing and reporting on these interactions remains critically important.

The exclusion of journalists from such meetings not only deprives the public of valuable insights into global diplomacy but also raises fundamental questions about the commitment to openness and transparency that is expected of democratic leaders.

In light of these developments, calls for greater media access to government activities have intensified. Advocates for press freedom argue that without the ability to directly observe and report on government actions, the media's capacity to inform the public and hold leaders accountable is severely compromised. As the debate over media access and transparency continues, the incident at the trilateral meeting stands as a poignant example of the ongoing tensions between the government and the press in the quest for an informed and engaged citizenry.

We want to hear from you! Please share your perspective by commenting below.


  1. If the Biden Administration is not allowing the Press to attend these type meetings, it only shows how bad this man whom they call President really is. The entire world knows he is suffering from Dementia and it has made this country the laughing stock of the entire world. If Democrats had any conscience about themselves, they would declare the 25th Amendment on this man at least that is my honest opinion. Shame on them and not really caring about this country. it shows they just want to keep power. How very sad for all.

  2. By all means, make these high level meetings completely transparent. It may well be that there was discussion regarding measures to improve security of those nations should China should decide to attack them. Certainly we should inform The Chinese about such plans, shouldn’t we? There are some things which happen in the pursue of diplomatic relations which should remain confidential. Could this be such an instance?

  3. This incident is yet another example of executive branch staff officials protecting an inept
    President. If this were Trump, our main stream media would be howling like neglected children.
    He Can’t be in an unscripted press conference. Doesn’t remember who he’s talking to. Talks to dead
    Foreign Dignitaries, Ambassadors and heads of state. Opens the border to criminals, terrorists
    and drug and child trafficking. Need I say more. Trump could ask one debate question concerning anything to Sleepy Joe and he would have a temper tantrum and the election would be over. Hope I live to see it. By the way, I’ve never and never will vote for Trump, but Joe is the absolute worst President in my adult lifetime and I’m 74, and it’s not even close.

    • Guy….I’m 80 years old and fully support Trump. He may say some things that people don’t like but he has proven in the 4 years that he was President that he can run the country where Americans come first. It will be a hard job to turn our country around to where it was 4 years ago, but if anyone can do it, it’s Trump. It is so obvious that this administration wants full control and will do “anything” to get it. Things have got to change and our votes in November will determine if we will get that change or if the government will take away everything we grew up loving about our America and it will be gone.

  4. This article is spot on! The public needs to hear every word that comes out of this man’s mouth… even if it’s word salad!


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here