The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) stands at the crossroads of several controversial projects that challenge our understanding of national security and ethical boundaries. Concerns mount about government agencies developing weapons that could target individuals based on their unique DNA signatures. Should the president call for investigating these operations?
DNA Weaponization and Genetic Warfare
The U.S. government has reportedly been collecting DNA samples from world leaders while simultaneously taking extraordinary measures to protect former President Obama’s genetic information. This alarming revelation comes as experts warn that personalized bioweapons could be developed to target specific individuals based on their unique genetic blueprints, creating assassination tools that would leave little evidence and appear as natural deaths.
The cost and accessibility of genetic manipulation tools have dramatically decreased in recent years, following what Gordon Moore of Intel once predicted. What once required million-dollar labs and teams of scientists can now potentially be accomplished with secondhand equipment and online resources, creating a democratization of biological knowledge that brings both promise and peril.
Covid, Anthrax, Lyme, and why the Pentagon and CIA would go and do a darn thing like confessing to a plan to deploy “biological agents which would appear to be of natural origin” in the JFK Files pic.twitter.com/TGIzy4QAce
— Mike Benz (@MikeBenzCyber) March 25, 2025
The CIA’s Technological Reach
At the center of these allegations stands Michael Crow, Arizona State University President and Chairman of In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s venture capital firm. Independent researcher Kristen Williamson has highlighted Crow’s pivotal role in what she describes as projects involving biowarfare, genetic engineering, digital surveillance, and even election irregularities that could fundamentally transform society.
The intelligence community’s interest in genetic information coincides with the rise of DNA-design competitions and virus-design websites that allow users to create customized genetic sequences. These platforms were originally developed for creating personalized medical treatments, but could potentially be repurposed for more nefarious applications by state or non-state actors with sufficient resources and expertise.
The CIA and security state's overreach is out of control. Programs like In-Q-Tel and DARPA expand rapidly with minimal oversight in DC. We must stop this unconstitutional overreach and hold these powers accountable.
From @MelKShow pic.twitter.com/Oxh81YQpYV
— John Kiriakou (@JohnKiriakou) April 14, 2025
Oversight and Accountability Concerns
Perhaps most concerning is the absence of robust international oversight for bio-design activities and genetic engineering projects. Harvard geneticist George Church explains that personalized medicine is already targeting specific genetic mutations with drugs like Gleevec, Zelboraf, and Xalkori, but this same technology could theoretically be reversed to create personalized harm rather than healing.
President Trump and congressional leaders have been called upon to investigate these allegations and establish greater accountability for intelligence community projects. The potential for misuse of these technologies represents a fundamental shift in national security threats, moving from traditional weapons of mass destruction to precisely targeted biological agents that could be deployed with minimal detection risk.