In a bold legal move, nine states have filed a lawsuit against the Biden administration, challenging an executive order that they argue oversteps constitutional bounds by attempting to federalize voter registration processes. The states—led by Louisiana, Arkansas, Kansas, and Missouri—are pushing back against President Biden's Executive Order 14019, which directs federal agencies to increase voter registration and participation.
Filed on Tuesday, the lawsuit accuses the administration of violating the Constitution by commandeering state resources and infringing upon states' rights to manage their own elections. The plaintiffs argue that the executive order is an unlawful expansion of federal power and a thinly veiled attempt to manipulate election outcomes in favor of the Democratic Party. The lawsuit seeks to block the implementation of the order, arguing that it is an unconstitutional encroachment on states' authority.
https://x.com/ArtCandee/status/1816117020322066925
The executive order, signed by President Biden in March 2021, instructs federal agencies to develop plans to promote voter registration and participation among their employees and the public. Critics argue that this order circumvents Congress and imposes federal control over elections, which have traditionally been managed by individual states. The states involved in the lawsuit contend that the order undermines their sovereignty and violates the separation of powers doctrine by giving the executive branch authority that should rest with the states.
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, who is leading the lawsuit, stated that the Biden administration's order is "an unconstitutional power grab that will lead to greater federal interference in our election process." He added that the states are "fighting to protect the integrity of our elections and the constitutional rights of our citizens." Landry's sentiments were echoed by other state officials, who argue that the order is an attempt to skew the electoral playing field.
https://x.com/Huberton/status/1777766832562172061
Supporters of the executive order, however, argue that it is a necessary step to ensure that all Americans have access to the ballot box, particularly in light of the barriers that have historically disenfranchised minority and low-income voters. They point out that the order encourages federal agencies to assist in voter registration, a task that they claim aligns with the federal government's duty to uphold civil rights.
Opponents argue that the executive order's emphasis on voter registration could lead to increased voter fraud, an accusation that has been repeatedly debunked by studies and experts. The states involved in the lawsuit are largely conservative and have been critical of the Biden administration's approach to election law, viewing it as an overreach that could undermine the integrity of the voting process.
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, another plaintiff in the lawsuit, emphasized that the states are not opposed to voter registration but are concerned about the federal government's involvement in what they see as a state matter. "We believe that voter registration is a state issue, and the federal government has no business meddling in our elections," Bailey said. "This order represents a dangerous precedent of federal overreach."
The lawsuit is likely to add to the growing tensions between the Biden administration and Republican-led states, which have clashed on a range of issues, including immigration, gun control, and COVID-19 regulations. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the future of federal election oversight and the balance of power between the federal government and the states.
